Political lawfare, exposed
They counted every check, every invoice, every ledger line as a separate crime — then elevated a misdemeanor into felonies by attaching an uncharged federal theory that was never tried. This is not justice. This is lawfare.
The Manhattan Case
How one misdemeanor became 34 felonies — and why the structure of the case itself is the scandal.
Each of the 34 counts corresponds to a specific check, invoice, or ledger entry that prosecutors argued was falsely logged as “legal expenses.” The 34 charges come from 11 invoices submitted by Michael Cohen, 12 ledger entries made by the Trump Organization, and 11 checks signed (some personally by Trump, some from his trust). All this for ONE offense which is a MISDEMEANOR, not a felony.
It is not illegal to have your lawyer pay for a nondisclosure agreement. Lawyers can sometimes write checks or handle payments on a client’s behalf in the context of a non-disclosure or settlement agreement. But the case was elevated to a felony because prosecutors argued it was done to cover up another crime: violating election laws by concealing damaging information from voters before the 2016 election.
How dishonest and bizarre to count one misdemeanor as 34 separate charges by counting each piece of evidence — then further change them into felonies by accusing him of violating a federal law that Trump was never tried and convicted for.
Judge Merchan literally gave to a group called “Stop Republicans”. He contributed to Biden’s campaign — which is against Section 100.5 of the New York Code of Judicial Conduct. Loren Merchan’s consultancy had raised at least $93 million in campaign donations for the election cycle. Authentic Campaigns bagged a staggering $36,414,889 during the 2024 election cycle, according to Open Secrets. This would make Loren Merchan one of the Democrats’ biggest fundraisers. She was also tied to Dan Goldman, another impeachment attorney, and worked for “Kamala Harris for the People.”
Merchan gagged Trump, ordering him not to make public comments. What happened to Freedom of Speech?
The Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution demands that a defendant “be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation.” D.A. Alvin Bragg had to piggyback Trump’s supposed falsifying business records crime onto a secondary crime in order to classify it as a felony instead of a misdemeanor. If he failed to do so, the statute of limitations would have run out.
The second crime finally came to light during the jury instructions. According to the court, Donald Trump attempted to influence an election by “unlawful means.” What were the unlawful means? Nobody ever specified. Instead of solving the unnamed crime issue, this only made it worse. The charge introduced a third mystery crime piggybacking off the second one. The third crime was never specified.
Merchan told the jury that the third crime could be multiple choice. It was a choose-your-own-adventure trial. He informed the jury that if they agreed Trump falsified business records to influence an election, they no longer had to agree unanimously on the third crime. At a constitutional level, the jury verdict needed to be unanimous. In Merchan’s courtroom, it did not. The jury merely needed to agree that there was a third crime — any crime. That denied Trump both Sixth Amendment notice rights and Fifth Amendment due process.
On the menu for the third crime was a Federal Election Commission Act (FECA) violation. While Stormy Daniels was allowed to take the stand and contradict herself, Merchan blocked the Trump team’s effort to bring in former Federal Election Commission member Bradley A. Smith to explain this area of the law to the jury. No other explanation fits: it may have ruined Bragg’s case.
Brought in from the top of Biden’s DOJ to Alvin Bragg’s Manhattan D.A. office specifically to try the case against Trump.
The case likely never happens without access to Michael Cohen’s Gmail from the Russia collusion investigations. Throw the convictions out on that alone.
Civil Lawfare
A civil case enabled by a one-year special law, funded by a major Democratic donor, timed to a presidential campaign.
This was a CIVIL case, not a criminal case. It was never even supposed to happen — until New York concocted the Adult Survivors Act (ASA) to bypass the statute of limitations. E. Jean Carroll’s case was filed on November 24, 2022, the very day the ASA window opened. The ASA was only valid for one year. Her legal fees were primarily funded by Reid Hoffman, co-founder of LinkedIn and a prominent Democratic donor. Anyone with a few synapses realizes this was enacted to go after Trump. Lawfare.
Carroll has always placed the incident in the mid-1990s but took 27 years to do something about it. Never filed a police report. She never told anyone about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality. She announced this just 3 days after Trump said he was running for president.
She said it occurred in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room off the lingerie area. A former manager testified the 6th floor wasn’t busy and such an assault would have been noticed.
Male DNA was detected on the dress sleeves — not identified as Trump. Defense offered a sample in Feb 2023. Judge Kaplan rejected it as too late.
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time. Her description of the dressing room made the sequence of events impossible.
History of falsely accusing men of rape (7 in total), including Les Moonves. She told Anderson Cooper: “most people think of rape as being sexy.”
ABC / Stephanopoulos were sued by Trump for the false claim of rape. It cost them $15 million, and they were required to pay $1 million for his legal fees. The same Judge Kaplan refused to delay the trial for Melania’s mother’s funeral.
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat after female genitals. The left still loves to label Trump a rapist. The record does not support the slogan.
This Site
libtard.fit is a political site. It exists to document and criticize the use of the legal system as a political weapon — selective prosecution, novel legal theories, special statutes timed to campaigns, and procedural rules bent in one direction.
The cases against Trump have been sold as open-and-shut. The record is more complicated: a misdemeanor elevated by an uncharged federal theory, a civil claim revived by a one-year window, judges with documented partisan activity, and media that treated contested civil findings as settled criminal facts.
Read the material. Check the primary sources. Decide for yourself.